Journal: Respiratory Research

Article Title: TMPRSS2 is a tumor suppressor and its downregulation promotes antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02870-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo and in vitro experimental validation of the bioinformatics findings. TMPRSS2-knockdown tumors display increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, expression of immune checkpoint molecules, and sensitization to immune checkpoint inhibitors. a TMPRSS2 knockdown markedly promoted proliferative and invasive abilities of A549 cells. b TMPRSS2 knockdown increased tumor volume and progression in Lewis tumor mouse models. Lewis tumor cells transfected with ShCon or ShTMPRSS2 lentivirus were subcutaneously injected into mice. The tumor volumes were measured every three days from the fifth day to the fifteenth. Data represent mean ± SEM. SEM, standard error of mean. ShTMPRSS2 versus ShCon group, n = 6 for each group, two-tailed Student’s t test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. c TMPRSS2 knockdown increased MSH6 expression in A549 cells, as evidenced by Western blotting. d TMPRSS2 knockdown enhanced the expression of MHC class I genes ( HLA-A , HLA-B , and HLA-C ) in A549 cells, as evidenced by real-time qPCR. e NK cells co-cultured with TMPRSS2 -knockdown A549 cells showing higher proliferation capacity than NK cells co-cultured with TMPRSS2 -wildtype A549 cells, as evidenced by the EDU proliferation assay. f CD8, CD49b, and PD-L1 immunofluorescence staining in Lewis orthotopic tumors and H-score analysis. ShTMPRSS2 versus shCon group, n = 6 for each group, two-tailed Student’s t test, *** p < 0.001. g - j Comparisons of TNF-α, IFN-γ, PD-1, and LAG3 expression on CD8 + T cells from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumor-bearing mice between TMPRSS2 -knockdown and TMPRSS2 -wildtype group (ShTMPRSS2 versus ShCon group, n = 6 for each group, two-tailed Student’s t test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). TILs were stained with CD3, CD8, TNF-α, and IFN-γ and were then analyzed by flow cytometry. Lymphocytes were gated according to forward scatter and side scatter. CD3 and CD8 staining was used to identify CD8 + T cells. k - m TMPRSS2 -knockdown tumors formed by subcutaneous injection of Lewis cells, as mentioned in ( b ). shCon and shTMPRSS2 tumor-bearing mice were divided into vehicle and BMS-1 groups. The vehicle and BMS-1 groups of mice were treated with solvent and BMS-1, respectively. k Representative images of tumor-bearing mice shown on the left. The right graph showing the change of tumor size in the tumor-bearing mice over time. Data represent mean ± SEM ( n = 6 for each group, two-tailed Student’s t test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001); Comparison of the volume ratios of mice tumors after and before treatment with BMS-1 between TMPRSS2 -knockdown and TMPRSS2 -wildtype groups (two-tailed Student’s t test, *** p < 0.001). Comparisons of TNF-α ( l ) and IFN-γ ( m ) expression on CD8 + T cells from TILs in tumor-bearing mice ( n = 6 for each group, two-tailed Student’s t test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Article Snippet: After 5 days, when the tumor volume was approximately 4–5 mm3, the mice were randomly divided into six groups, with half of the ShCon and ShTMPRSS2 mice treated with 150 U/L PD1/PDL1 inhibitor BMS-1 (concentration 500 mg/mL; i.p.) (MCE Cat. No. HY-19991) every 3 days.

Techniques: In Vivo, In Vitro, Biomarker Discovery, Knockdown, Expressing, Transfection, Injection, Two Tailed Test, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Proliferation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Solvent, Comparison

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and PD-L1 blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Activation Assay, In Situ, Inhibition, Blocking Assay

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Chemical structures of amphiphilic semiconducting polymeric modulators and schematic illustration of their self-assembly and surface modification to form SPINs. b The molar ratios of each component in different SPINs. c Zeta potentials and hydrodynamic sizes of different SPINs in 1× PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) ( n = 4). d Photographs of erythrocytes after incubation with 1× PBS buffer (negative control), 1% Triton X-100 (positive control), and 1× PBS buffer containing SPINs at the concentration of 100 µg/mL for 2 h, followed by centrifugation. e Hemolysis percentages of erythrocytes after incubation with SPINs at different concentrations for 2 h ( n = 4). f Schematic illustration of US irradiation of SPIN D2 solutions covered with a pork tissue. g ESR spectra of 1 O 2 for SPIN D2 (20 µg/mL) after US irradiation (1.2 W/cm 2 , 3 min) without or with coverage of pork tissues at different thicknesses. h Release profiles of aPD-L1 and NLG919 from SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) after US irradiation for different time ( n = 4). i PD-L1/PD-1 binding activity assay after treatment with free aPD-L1 or SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) with or without US irradiation ( n = 4). SPIN D2 – US versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was calculated via a two-tailed Student’s t test. *** P < 0.001. In ( g – i ), the power intensity of US irradiation was 1.2 W/cm 2 (1.0 MHz, 50% duty cycle). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Modification, Incubation, Negative Control, Positive Control, Concentration Assay, Centrifugation, Irradiation, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schedule for the establishment of primary and distant tumors, triple systemic injection of SPINs (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) via tail vein, US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min), and analysis of immune responses. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 6) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). SPIN D2 + US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus drug: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) receiving different treatments as indicated. e Schematic illustration of treatment of rechallenged tumor mouse models using SPINs. f Growths of rechallenged tumors in Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after injection of saline or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min) ( n = 5). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. g The survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 10). h Flow cytometry analysis of populations of effector memory T cells in the spleen of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 4). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0059. i Differentially expressed gene numbers in tumor tissues of mice after different treatments. j Relative expression of Carl , Hmgb1-ps1 , Hmgb1-ps2 , Cd80 , Cd86 , Cd40 , Pdcd1 , Cd3e , Cd8a , Ifng , Gzmb , Cxcl1 , Cxcl2 , Cxcl9 , Cxcl10 , Cxcl11 , Ccl4 , Ccl5 , Il1b , Il2 , Il6 , Il7 , Il15 , Ido1 , and Cd274 in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after different treatments (the experiment was repeated independently five times with similar results). k Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of relative gene expression in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments ( n = 5). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Injection, Irradiation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic of sono-immunotherapy of subcutaneous pancreatic mouse tumors covered with 5-cm tissue. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), SPIN 0 or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). The primary tumors were covered with 5-cm tissue under US irradiation. SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) after different treatments for 60 days. e Schematic of US-mediated deep-tissue sonodynamic therapy of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors. f Radiolabeling stability of 131 I-SPIN 0 after storage in saline or 50% serum at 37 °C for different time ( n = 3). g , h SPECT imaging ( g ) and signal intensity ( h ) of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of 131 I-SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) for different time ( n = 4). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. i Computed tomography (CT) imaging of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of saline or SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 30 min). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. j Tumor volume of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors ( n = 3) after treatments as indicated for different days. Saline + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P = 0.0108. k H&E staining images of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after different treatments. The experiment was repeated independently three times with similar results. l Survival curves of orthotopic pancreatic tumor-bearing rabbits ( n = 4) after different treatments for 20 days. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Injection, Irradiation, Radioactivity, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Imaging, Computed Tomography, Staining, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ) in blood of mice ( n = 4) at 30 day after systemic administrations of saline, SPIN 0 , SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 1.2 mg/mL) or free-drug mixture (8 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). Saline – US versus drug − US: P = 0.0023; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0006; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0071 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0004; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0093 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ). c , d Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ) in spleen of mice ( n = 4) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0008; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0005; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0015 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0002; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0049 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ). e Representative H&E staining images of liver after 30 days of treatments in different groups (white arrows indicate the infiltrated lymphocytes). The experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. f Heatmap to show relative fold of cytokine levels in serum of mice after different treatments for 30 days relative to those in saline control group. g , h Serum levels of ALT ( g ) and AST ( h ) in mice ( n = 5) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0010; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0020; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0054 for ALT ( g ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0013 for AST ( h ). i Summary comparison of the antitumor immunity and irAEs between SPIN D2 -mediated sono-immunotherapy and free-drug treatment. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Irradiation, Staining, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Article Title: Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01823-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: The FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors

Article Snippet: PD-1 , Cemiplimab , Basal cell carcinoma, cervical squamous cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer , Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Techniques: